Extend faq.using to discuss fork failures
Fri Nov 4 16:22:00 GMT 2011
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:09PM +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>On 03/11/2011 21:05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I would still prefer eschewing actively negative words like "hostile" and just
>> neutrally stating that Windows does not use a fork/exec model and does not offer
>> any easy way to implement fork.
>Hmm, yes, I'll fix that.
>> I'd also like to see specific errors mentioned so that when people are searching for
>> a solution to the problem they will be able to find it in the FAQ.
>Is there something wrong with the itemized list which follows that sentence?
No, sorry. I'm email challenged at the moment so I missed it.
More information about the Cygwin-patches