gcc produces foo.exe, not foo

[Earnie Boyd]

---Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
>
> On 28-Sep-1998, Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Is their a reverse of the linker option --force-exe-suffix?
> > 
> > I've tried --noforce-exe-suffix and that doesn't work.
> 
> Did you try `--no-force-exe-suffix'?

`ld' returns: unrecognized option.
==
-                \\||//
-----------o0O0--Earnie--0O0o------------
--        earnie_boyd@yahoo.com        --
-- http://freeyellow.com/members5/gw32 --
--------------ooo0O--O0ooo---------------

PS: Newbie's, you should visit my page.
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

-
For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to
"gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help".