Repost, different list...File::Spec, Cygwin, Syntactic vs. Semantic path analysis
Hack Kampbjorn
cygwin@hack.kampbjorn.com
Mon Jan 13 03:04:00 GMT 2003
LA Walsh wrote:
> Cygwin, and possibly, the Win32 module, are inconsistent in handling
> the differences between i:/foobar/ and i:. On one hand i: is
> considered a 'volume' but on the other hand i:/ seems to evaluate to
> the same, incorrect, value. In "Win32", each 'fs' of form "<x>:', x
> of class <[:alpha:]>, there is a process-specific "current
> directory". This can be seen by:
>
In the old DOS days yes, but in Win32 there is only one current
directory. The illusion of having a current directory per drive and an
active drive is maintained in cmd.exe (or is it in the MS C runtime?).
As cygwin doesn't use it, i:foobar and i:/foobar is always the same.
<deleted long list of tests that demostrate this/>
--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Hack Kampbjørn
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list