Is our use of Cygwin to build & run OpenOCD a good one?
Jose Isaias Cabrera
jicman@outlook.com
Mon May 20 14:27:00 GMT 2019
Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote...
>On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote:
><snip>
>> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a
>> (pre)historic solution."
>
>The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an
>excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.
Indeed. I have been using cygwin since 1996-7. Can't remember the exact year, but it has been God-sent, and it has been in every Windows machine I have had control. Just my 0.02. Thanks.
josé
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list